请阅读 Passage2,完成问题。
Passage 2
First there were hammers banging.Then paint brushes.Then carpet.Soon we had a new room above the garage.And my grandmother moved in.
It was the late 1960s, I was 10 and had no idea that we were going against the grain, that the trend was for families to splinter, seniors to take better and longer care of themselves, kids to move away younger and younger.
All I knew was that our family had three generations under one roof, which made a difference in who sat where in the car, what desserts mysteriously disappeared overnight and how long you waited outside the bathroom door.
This past week, a new census report raised a lot of eyebrows.In the past decade, there has been a resuming of the family deck: a 30 percent rise in U.S.households with at least three generations, People are moving back in.Generations are consolidating
So I guess we were ahead of our time.Forget about a babysitter.Of course, today this has more to do with money than anything else.Senior citizens have a harder time paying their bills and their children have a harder time shelling out monthly checks for retirement or nursing homes.Kids can’t find jobs, even college grads.What it means, ultimately, is more people under one roof, with a broader span of years between them.Braces and dentures.Grey hair and dyed hair.This is lamented as a regrettable consequence of a feeble economy.But I’m not sure it’s a bad thing.
I learned a lot from having our grandmother in the house.For one thing, it beat hiring a babysitter we didn’t like.And there was someone else to take us to school or drive us to places when our folks were working.There was another family member at the school plays and another person to cry to if we were hurting.I got to watch how my mother related to her mother, and I saw that mine wasn’t the only generation that found the one before it confounding and, at times, infuriating.
I also heard more family history than I did with just one older generation under the roof.There was no shortage of conversation.Dinners were louder and animated.In short, we were bigger.My grandmother spoke about grant’s neighborhood, sitting on fire escapes and drinking egg creams, and talked about listening to the radio during the Pearl Harbor attacks.They talked about relatives I’d never met and never would meet, my bloodline.(缺失部分内容)
It wasn’t all “The Waltons”.I knew who I was and where I came from more once my grandmother called our home her home.
There’s a wonderful film called “Avalon” that follows an immigrant’s family in the 20th century.At the beginning of the film, it is Thanksgiving, and a small city home is Jammed with uncles, aunts, grandparents, kids.At the end of the film, years later, it is Thanksgiving again, and a family of four sits in a suburban kitchen eating with the TV on.Yes, it was cramped, sometimes annoying, and it was no fun waiting for a shower or hearing my grandmother snoring.But years later, when she finally moved out, I can tell you this.It got quieter.It was less funny.We were still a family, but we were … smaller.
So the economy may be driving us more under one roof, and we may whine that our independence is withering.But for centuries, kids, parents, grandparents and even great-grandparents have been sharing space, and when it stopped, we began complaining about the collapse of family values.Maybe the economy, of all things, is offering us a small fix.
Which of the following is closest in meaning to the underlined phrase “raised a lot of eyebrows” in Paragraph 4?
阅读Passage l,完成问题。
Passage 1
In recent years, however, society has come to understand the limitations of schools that merely sort and rank students. We have discovered that students in the bottom one-third to one-half of the rank order —plus all who drop out before being ranked--fail to develop the foundational reading, writing, and mathematical proficiencies needed to survive in, let alone contribute to, an increasingly technically complex and ethnically diverse culture. So today, in asking schools to leave no child behind, society is asking that educators raise up the bottom of the rank-order distribution to a specified level of competence. We call those expectations our"academic achievement standards". Every state has them, and, as a matter of public policy, schools are to be held accountable for making sure that all students meet them.
To be clear, the mission of sorting has not been eliminated from the schooling process. For the foresee-able future, students will still be ranked at the end of high school. However, society now dictates that such a celebration of differences in amount learned must start at a certain minimum level of achievement for all.
The implications of this change in mission for the role of assessment are profound. Assessment and grad-ing procedures designed to permit only a few students to succeed ( those at the top of the rank-order distribu-tion) must now be revised to permit the possibility that all students could succeed at some appropriate level.
Furthermore, procedures that permitted( perhaps even encouraged)some students to give up in hopelessness and to stop trying must now be replaced by others that promote hope and continuous effort. In short, the entire emotional environment surrounding the prospect of being evaluated must change, especially for perennial low achievers.
The students' mission is no longer merely to beat other students in the achievement race. At least part of their goal must be to become competent. Teachers must believe that all students can achieve a certain level of academic success, must bring all of their students to believe this of themselves, must accommodate the fact that students learn at different rates by making use of differentiated instruction, and must guide all students toward the attainment of standards.
The driving dynamic force for students cannot merely be competition for an artificial scarcity of success.
Because all students can and must succeed in meeting standards, cooperation and collaboration must come into play. The driving forces must be confidence, optimism, and persistence--for all, not just for some. All students must come to believe that they can succeed at learning if they try. They must have continuous access to evidence of what they believe to be credible academic success, however small. This new understanding has spawned increased interest in formative assessment in recent years.
Which is meant by the author about the emotional promise of assessment for students?
请谈谈“重结果的写作教学模式”和“重过程的写作教学模式”的不同。
请谈谈“重结果的写作教学模式”和“重过程的写作教学模式”的不同。
请谈谈重结果的写作教学模式和重过程的写作教学模式的不同,并分别说明这两种教学模式的不足之处。
请谈谈重结果的写作教学模式和重过程的写作教学模式的不同,并分别说明这两种教学模式的不足之处。
下面是某初中教师的课堂教学片段。
(T asked Ss to make sentencesaccording to the information on the blackboard.)
T: Now, let's look at theblackboard and make sentences. I say "I don't have a basketball"andyou say "Our teacher doesn't have a basketball". I say "I have avolleyball" and you say"Our teacher has a volleyball". Li Xing,make the third sentence ... (T wrote sentences on the blackboard.)
Li Xing: Tom have a tennisracket.
T: Is it correct? No, we shouldsay it like this "Tom has a tennis racket". We don't put"have"after "He, She, Tom, Lucy". We should say "HehasShe hasTom hasLucy has ...".
(T wrote the wrong sentence onthe blackboard and corrected it.)
T: Next one, Li Lei, please.
Li Lei: Jim has a ping-pongball.
T: Yes. (T wrote it on theblackboard.) Next one, Zhang Hong, please.
Zhang Hong: Li Lei don't have asoccer ball.
T: No, no, no. Wrong again. Whatis the correct answer?
Ss: Li Lei doesn't have a soccerball.
T: Yes. (T wrote the correctanswer on the blackboard.)
根据所给信息从下列三个方面作答。
请分析学生课堂回答错误的主要原因。
该教师采用了什么方式来纠正学生的错误?
针对学生在该课堂中回答错误的情况,教师应如何进行反馈和引导?